no more iron rice bowls -j9九游会网站

should corporations continue to offer jobs for life or has this practice already become obsolete? personally, i concede that jobs for life are no longer in accordance with the thriving business of the 21st century.
��˾�dz���ӧ�ü���ϊ��������ṩ��������˵���������ѿ���ʱ���𣿾��ҹ��˶��ԣ��ҳ���ϊ�����������ڶ�ʮһ���������������ⲻһ�¡�
admittedly, staff will feel less pressured and more secure if they are guaranteed a job for life. instead of feeling anxious regarding a future fraught with uncertainly, employees can still rely on their job even if other things go awry. however, the ultimate goal of any business enterprise—maximizes the profit—renders this type of job obsolete. first, in order to improve productivity, companies have to dismiss workers who are less competent or less industrious. otherwise, retaining staff that are not qualified or cannot meet the standards is detrimental to business. furthermore, since no jobs are provided for life, employees who are ambitious and hard-working will naturally be motivated to achieve excellence. in addition, the ubiquitous sense of competition also makes permanent jobs outmoded. although life-long positions are offered occasionally to commend individuals who have made a major contribution, in most circumstances, contracts are drawn on a yearly basis.
��ȼ�����ա����ϊ���������ϵĺ�����ա����е�ѹ�����ٺ͸���ȫ�������ǹо����ƕ�δ��������ȷ���ԣ���ʹ��������������ա����ȼ�����������ǵĺ�����ȼ�������յ�ŀ���κ���ҵ��������������๤����ʱ����һ��ϊ����������ʣ���˾���ò���ͳ���ְ�����͵�ա����������ס���ϸ�򲻷��ϱ�׼��ա�������ڷ�չҵ�񡣴��⣬����û��ϊ�������ṩ�ĺ�������щ���ij������ڷܵ�ա����ȼ������׷��׿խ�����⣬�����޴����ڵĸо�ҳ���������եĺ�����ʱ����ȼ����ְλż�������������ش��׵ĸ��ˣ������ڴ��������£���ͬҫ��ÿһ��ϊ������
in the final analysis, i believe that the diminishing of permanent jobs is inevitable and this is actually advantageous for societal progress.
�����ķ����у�����ϊ���������եĺ����dz��ɱ���ģ���ʵ��������������������